Difference between revisions of "Talk:Slug"
From Conservapedia
m (email formatting...) |
PaulBurnett (Talk | contribs) (Reference does not exist) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to use as a reference for assignments and such. | ::I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to use as a reference for assignments and such. | ||
:So there you go. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST) | :So there you go. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Almost three years later - the "book" still isn't available. Not only is the article patently un-encyclopedic, its single reference appears to be non-existent. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 00:29, 27 November 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:29, November 27, 2010
I can't seem to find that reference. Is it a book? A website? HelpJazz 14:08, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- I recieved an email from Daretobelieve, the user who added the reference:
- It is a very new book, and relatively unheard of and has not actually been fully distributed yet. A colleague of mine wrote it, he's spent the last 5 years studying these slugs.
- I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to use as a reference for assignments and such.
- So there you go. HelpJazz 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Almost three years later - the "book" still isn't available. Not only is the article patently un-encyclopedic, its single reference appears to be non-existent. PaulBurnett 00:29, 27 November 2010 (EST)
