Difference between revisions of "Talk:Slug"
From Conservapedia
(update, it's a book) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I can't seem to find that reference. Is it a book? A website? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:08, 24 January 2008 (EST) | I can't seem to find that reference. Is it a book? A website? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:08, 24 January 2008 (EST) | ||
:I recieved an email from Daretobelieve, the user who added the reference: | :I recieved an email from Daretobelieve, the user who added the reference: | ||
| − | ::It is a very new book, and relatively unheard of and has not actually | + | ::It is a very new book, and relatively unheard of and has not actually been fully distributed yet. A colleague of mine wrote it, he's spent the last 5 years studying these slugs. |
| − | + | ::I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to use as a reference for assignments and such. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ::I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to | + | |
| − | + | ||
:So there you go. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST) | :So there you go. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Almost three years later - the "book" still isn't available. Not only is the article patently un-encyclopedic, its single reference appears to be non-existent. [[User:PaulBurnett|PaulBurnett]] 00:29, 27 November 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | :::Agreed. This user "Daretobelieve" decided upon a false entry with a non-existent book. You may make corrections as you see fit, or we can delete it and start over. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:35, 27 November 2010 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:35, November 27, 2010
I can't seem to find that reference. Is it a book? A website? HelpJazz 14:08, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- I recieved an email from Daretobelieve, the user who added the reference:
- It is a very new book, and relatively unheard of and has not actually been fully distributed yet. A colleague of mine wrote it, he's spent the last 5 years studying these slugs.
- I hope it isn't a problem that the book isn't available for people to use as a reference for assignments and such.
- So there you go. HelpJazz 11:17, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Almost three years later - the "book" still isn't available. Not only is the article patently un-encyclopedic, its single reference appears to be non-existent. PaulBurnett 00:29, 27 November 2010 (EST)
- Agreed. This user "Daretobelieve" decided upon a false entry with a non-existent book. You may make corrections as you see fit, or we can delete it and start over. Karajou 00:35, 27 November 2010 (EST)
- Almost three years later - the "book" still isn't available. Not only is the article patently un-encyclopedic, its single reference appears to be non-existent. PaulBurnett 00:29, 27 November 2010 (EST)
