Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎New Proposal: new section
Line 102: Line 102:  
== Relativity ==
 
== Relativity ==
 
This article seems to agree with a lot of the principles of the theory of relativity, which appears to be inconsistent with other part of conservapedia, in particular, [http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity], entitled 'counter examples to relativity'. I think this article was written by a liberal parading as a true conservative.
 
This article seems to agree with a lot of the principles of the theory of relativity, which appears to be inconsistent with other part of conservapedia, in particular, [http://conservapedia.com/Counterexamples_to_Relativity], entitled 'counter examples to relativity'. I think this article was written by a liberal parading as a true conservative.
 +
 +
== New Proposal ==
 +
 +
I'm not entirely well versed in theoretical physics but for anyone who is, this article by Dr. Jason Lisle seems like it has some interesting possible solutions:
 +
 +
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v3/n1/anisotropic-synchrony-convention
32

edits

Navigation menu