Difference between revisions of "Supramolecular chemistry"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(ref to "creation scientist" not supported by ref)
(stick to the topic)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Supramolecular chemistry''' is different from [[organic chemistry]] or [[inorganic chemistry]] (i.e., [[physical chemistry]]<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Inorganic_chemistry</ref>) in that it does not focus only on the strong but also the weak.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supramolecular_chemistry</ref>  As with other fields in modern [[chemistry]], it owes enormous gratitude to the work and writings of [[Robert Boyle]] — a scientist whose love of [[God]]’s [[truth]] led him to overcome the chief errors of alchemical theory which were hindering the development of truly scientific chemistry.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v12/i1/chemistry.asp</ref>  By studying the weak as well as the strong, and reporting their works through the peer-reviewed process,<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/arj/v1/n1/theology-peer-review</ref> these modern scholars follows the code outlined in Ephesians 4:1–16 ("I, therefore, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, ''with all lowliness and gentleness, with long suffering'', bearing with one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace") and are probably a truer reflection of [[Christ]], functioning as part of the body of Christ, which carries out the work that pleases Him.
+
'''Supramolecular chemistry''' is different from [[organic chemistry]] or [[inorganic chemistry]] (i.e., [[physical chemistry]]<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/Inorganic_chemistry</ref>) in that it does not focus only on the strong but also the weak.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supramolecular_chemistry</ref>  As with other fields in modern [[chemistry]], it owes enormous gratitude to the work and writings of [[Robert Boyle]] — a scientist whose love of [[God]]’s [[truth]] led him to overcome the chief errors of alchemical theory which were hindering the development of truly scientific chemistry.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v12/i1/chemistry.asp</ref>   
  
 
The chemists who pioneered the field, Lehn (whose father was a [[church]] [[organ]]ist), Cram (who sang in the [[choir]] and in a barbershop quartet), and Pedersen (who studied in University of Dayton because it was run by the Society of [[Mary]]) was awarded with a [[Nobel prize]] in 1987.<ref>http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1987/#</ref>
 
The chemists who pioneered the field, Lehn (whose father was a [[church]] [[organ]]ist), Cram (who sang in the [[choir]] and in a barbershop quartet), and Pedersen (who studied in University of Dayton because it was run by the Society of [[Mary]]) was awarded with a [[Nobel prize]] in 1987.<ref>http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1987/#</ref>

Revision as of 18:47, February 8, 2011

Supramolecular chemistry is different from organic chemistry or inorganic chemistry (i.e., physical chemistry[1]) in that it does not focus only on the strong but also the weak.[2] As with other fields in modern chemistry, it owes enormous gratitude to the work and writings of Robert Boyle — a scientist whose love of God’s truth led him to overcome the chief errors of alchemical theory which were hindering the development of truly scientific chemistry.[3]

The chemists who pioneered the field, Lehn (whose father was a church organist), Cram (who sang in the choir and in a barbershop quartet), and Pedersen (who studied in University of Dayton because it was run by the Society of Mary) was awarded with a Nobel prize in 1987.[4]