Difference between revisions of "Woodpecker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MaxFletcher (talk | contribs) |
(just a few small changes) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Evidence against [[Evolution]] == | == Evidence against [[Evolution]] == | ||
| − | The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird | + | The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird would not have been able to feed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then what would have been the reason for it to evolve a thicker skull?<ref>http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics</ref> [[Evolutionists]] have not been able to produce an answer to this question. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 11:01, March 17, 2011
A woodpecker is a bird that pounds its beak into a tree's surface to find food.[1] There are 21 species of woodpeckers in the United States. [2]
Evidence against Evolution
The skull of the woodpecker is uniquely suited to absorb the intense shocks generated by its feeding habits. If the skull was weaker at some point in the past, the bird would not have been able to feed in such a manner. But if the bird didn't feed in such a manner, then what would have been the reason for it to evolve a thicker skull?[3] Evolutionists have not been able to produce an answer to this question.
References
- ↑ http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/woodpeckers.php
- ↑ Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management, WOODPECKERS, by Rex E. Marsh, 2005 [1]
- ↑ http://creation.com/stuart-burgess-interview-biomimetics