Difference between revisions of "Talk:H4 Handy Recorder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Delete?: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I'm not sure what relevance/importance this article has. It's written like an ad, and as I'm unsure of how to tag an article for deletion I figured this was the best way to bring attention to it. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 23:21, 25 March 2011 (EDT) | I'm not sure what relevance/importance this article has. It's written like an ad, and as I'm unsure of how to tag an article for deletion I figured this was the best way to bring attention to it. [[User:DennyW66|DennyW66]] 23:21, 25 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Believe it or not, this page was written by a sysop (though I too would tend to exclude it from an encyclopedia). These users have a deeper knowledge of article standards than the rest of us, so this one must be fine. I assume it would be OK if you plan to write similar articles. --[[User:DanN|DanN]] 11:09, 26 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, March 26, 2011
Why is this article still there? It is clearly an advertisement and there has been talk of deleting it but nothing has been done Wilmington 09:44, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
- Looking at the history doesn't reveal a deletion tag having been placed on it before. if you feel it should eb deleted, please add a tag saying why. Blanking the text isn't very constructive, as the article is still there, but even more boring to look at than before :D File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 09:48, 16 June 2007 (EDT)
- How much are these and where can I get one? Seems like a cool toy... although, perhaps the article itself should be more generic (portable digital recorder?). Human 15:43, 14 November 2008 (EST)
Delete?
I'm not sure what relevance/importance this article has. It's written like an ad, and as I'm unsure of how to tag an article for deletion I figured this was the best way to bring attention to it. DennyW66 23:21, 25 March 2011 (EDT)
- Believe it or not, this page was written by a sysop (though I too would tend to exclude it from an encyclopedia). These users have a deeper knowledge of article standards than the rest of us, so this one must be fine. I assume it would be OK if you plan to write similar articles. --DanN 11:09, 26 March 2011 (EDT)