Difference between revisions of "Talk:Token conservative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→In regards to the article title: agree) |
KingHanksley (talk | contribs) (→Krauthammer: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I think you have a point. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:31, 12 November 2009 (EST) | :I think you have a point. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:31, 12 November 2009 (EST) | ||
::I agree. we like google hits :) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:06, 12 November 2009 (EST) | ::I agree. we like google hits :) [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 01:06, 12 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Krauthammer == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does he count? I never see him write on evolution or abortion - he's a foreign policy columnist, and he is a foreign policy conservative. | ||
Revision as of 19:09, May 8, 2011
In regards to the article title
In regards to the title of this article, the phrase "Liberal media conservative" gets me 137 google hits, only one of which--this one--seems to be germane to the topic at hand. Suggest perhaps changing it to "token conservative," which more accurately describes the intended phenomenon with more commonly-used terminology (179,000 hits) MichaelHWC 00:19, 12 November 2009 (EST)
- I think you have a point. --Jpatt 00:31, 12 November 2009 (EST)
- I agree. we like google hits :) RJJensen 01:06, 12 November 2009 (EST)
Krauthammer
Does he count? I never see him write on evolution or abortion - he's a foreign policy columnist, and he is a foreign policy conservative.