Difference between revisions of "Oil resources"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RichieHZ (Talk) to last revision by DanielPulido) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''Oil resources'' are [[fossil fuel]] reserves. [[Liberal|Liberals]] suggest that we ought not use certain oil reserves. | + | ''Oil resources'' are [[fossil fuel]] reserves. [[Liberal|Liberals]] suggest that we ought not use certain oil reserves. This is because oil companies have been known to ruthlessly exploit these resources at great environmental and human cost. Oil companies in the Amazon destroy the livelihoods of the indigenous. |
| − | [[George Landrith]] disagrees: | + | [[George Landrith]] disagrees, because he doesn't care that oil will destroy us all: |
:We have tremendous oil [[resources]] that we do not use -- in the outer [[continental shelf]] and in the frozen [[tundra]] of [[Alaska]], just to name two of the many possibilities. - [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26730 ''Human Events'' ] | :We have tremendous oil [[resources]] that we do not use -- in the outer [[continental shelf]] and in the frozen [[tundra]] of [[Alaska]], just to name two of the many possibilities. - [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26730 ''Human Events'' ] | ||
[[category:Energy]] | [[category:Energy]] | ||
[[category:Ecology]] | [[category:Ecology]] | ||
[[Category:Geology]] | [[Category:Geology]] | ||
Revision as of 23:35, May 28, 2011
Oil resources are fossil fuel reserves. Liberals suggest that we ought not use certain oil reserves. This is because oil companies have been known to ruthlessly exploit these resources at great environmental and human cost. Oil companies in the Amazon destroy the livelihoods of the indigenous.
George Landrith disagrees, because he doesn't care that oil will destroy us all:
- We have tremendous oil resources that we do not use -- in the outer continental shelf and in the frozen tundra of Alaska, just to name two of the many possibilities. - Human Events