Difference between revisions of "Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(a start)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In ''Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells'', 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of [[New Jersey]], Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez.
+
In ''Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells'', 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of [[New Jersey]], Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez. Menendez was not recalled.
 
[[Category:recall]]
 
[[Category:recall]]

Revision as of 03:33, May 30, 2011

In Committee to Recall Robert Menendez v. Wells, 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 40 (Mar. 16, 2010), the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, unanimously held that the Secretary of State of New Jersey must accept and file the recall petition and allow the process to move forward with respect to the recall of a U.S. Senator, Robert Menendez. Menendez was not recalled.