Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
518 bytes added ,  01:53, April 6, 2007
→‎Abuse of sysop priviledge: there's a limit to patience for nonsense
Line 291: Line 291:  
::::ohhh, ok.  This is a reference to the Politcal Spectrum Theory once again. People are not born "moderate" or  "center-right" as they are Jewish for example, or Black, male or female, or as some would theorize "born homosexual".  We can't pass off theories like "leftism" for example, as being doctrinal or definitive of anything.  It means different things to different people and different cultures at different places at different times.  It's all subjective, and not very definitive or anything.  [[User:RobS|RobS]]
 
::::ohhh, ok.  This is a reference to the Politcal Spectrum Theory once again. People are not born "moderate" or  "center-right" as they are Jewish for example, or Black, male or female, or as some would theorize "born homosexual".  We can't pass off theories like "leftism" for example, as being doctrinal or definitive of anything.  It means different things to different people and different cultures at different places at different times.  It's all subjective, and not very definitive or anything.  [[User:RobS|RobS]]
 
:::::In that case the 'so-called' should preceed any mention of left or right, preferrably throughout Conservapdia. [[User:Order]] 6 April 11:00 (AEST)
 
:::::In that case the 'so-called' should preceed any mention of left or right, preferrably throughout Conservapdia. [[User:Order]] 6 April 11:00 (AEST)
 +
::::::I agree. And it's gonna be a lot of work.  It would help to get solid definitions, but so far all we've seen is
 +
:::::::''A liberal is a leftist''--->click here
 +
:::::::''A leftist is a liberal''--->click here
 +
:::::::''leftist oppose oppression.  Hence Communists are leftists''
 +
:::::::I'll just revert til the cows come home until somebody seriously tackles this issue.  But it's not my place to define nonsense I quit trying to make sense out of thirty years ago.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:53, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
 
** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That's simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.
 
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.
 
** In the next edit, he makes his statement even more opinionated, and claims that liberals now reject democracy.
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,884

edits

Navigation menu