| Line 95: |
Line 95: |
| | | | |
| | 1. Evolutionists can't have it both ways on the [[Origin of life]]. You can't spout on about [[Origin of life|chemical evolution]] from one side of your mouth, but on the other hand say it has nothing to do with evolution. Face it, evolution is a religion/philosophy. It is not science. | | 1. Evolutionists can't have it both ways on the [[Origin of life]]. You can't spout on about [[Origin of life|chemical evolution]] from one side of your mouth, but on the other hand say it has nothing to do with evolution. Face it, evolution is a religion/philosophy. It is not science. |
| | + | :Evolution explains the diversity of life, it DOES NOT NOR HAS IT EVER purported to explain how biological life began. |
| | | | |
| | 2. I see a noticeable lack of footnotes and/or support for your contentions. But even if you had footnotes and/or "information", you would probably link to or provide junk science "information". (talkorigins, etc.). | | 2. I see a noticeable lack of footnotes and/or support for your contentions. But even if you had footnotes and/or "information", you would probably link to or provide junk science "information". (talkorigins, etc.). |
| | + | :To avoid flooding the page, yes I left footnotes off. What specifically would you like information for and I will provide it. |
| | | | |
| | By the way, are you an atheist? If so, please provide proof and evidence that atheism is true. | | By the way, are you an atheist? If so, please provide proof and evidence that atheism is true. |
| | | | |
| | I suggest rereading Conservapedia's [[evolution]] and [[atheism]] articles over and over until they sink in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:52, 28 June 2011 (EDT) | | I suggest rereading Conservapedia's [[evolution]] and [[atheism]] articles over and over until they sink in. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:52, 28 June 2011 (EDT) |
| | + | :The Evolution article is seriously flawed and no, I'm not an Atheist. I actually do believe in Theistic Evolution, but I cant provide any verifiable evidence to support that idea so I dont advance it as fact. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 18:46, 28 June 2011 (EDT) |