Difference between revisions of "Political cards"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(building table)
(a start on listing specific "cards")
Line 9: Line 9:
 
!Disadvantage
 
!Disadvantage
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|sexist card
 
|
 
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|race card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|hate speech card
 
|
 
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|anti-gay card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
 +
|intolerant card
 +
|
 
|
 
|
 +
|-
 +
|uneducated card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|
+
|extreme card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|
+
|anti-environment card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|
+
|insensitive card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|
+
|greedy card
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|

Revision as of 21:01, July 9, 2011

Political cards are tactics used in politics, the media, and other adversarial settings in order to appeal to emotion or even prejudice rather than reason. They are based on analogy of playing a card game, especially bridge. In contrast with most card games, however, a political card can be played at any time, no matter how irrational or irrelevant to the topic.

A card is "played" when one side relies on a particular issue in order to gain an upper hand in the debate or controversy.

Political card Advantage Disadvantage
sexist card
race card
hate speech card
anti-gay card
intolerant card
uneducated card
extreme card
anti-environment card
insensitive card
greedy card