Difference between revisions of "Political cards"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added column for examples) |
(Reading from a prop, Dan Quayle once misspelled "potato", and liberals destroyed him by playing this card) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
|uneducated card | |uneducated card | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | |Reading from a prop, Dan Quayle once misspelled "potato", and [[liberals]] destroyed him by playing this card |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 21:06, July 9, 2011
Political cards are tactics used in politics, the media, and other adversarial settings in order to appeal to emotion or even prejudice rather than reason. They are based on analogy of playing a card game, especially bridge. Indeed, there may be about 52 political cards, just as in a deck of cards for bridge and other games.
In contrast with most card games, however, a political card can be played at any time, no matter how irrational or irrelevant to the topic.
A card is "played" when one side relies on a particular issue in order to gain an upper hand in the debate or controversy.
| Political card | Meaning | Example | Advantage | Disadvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sexist card | ||||
| race card | ||||
| hate speech card | ||||
| anti-gay card | ||||
| intolerant card | ||||
| uneducated card | Reading from a prop, Dan Quayle once misspelled "potato", and liberals destroyed him by playing this card | |||
| extreme card | ||||
| anti-environment card | ||||
| insensitive card | ||||
| greedy card | ||||
| fundamentalist card | ||||
| creationist card | ||||