Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Featured articles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (no objection) |
JamesWilson (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::::@JW: my understanding is that this is open to "civilians". @Tracy: Unfortunately, these are two different issues. Recommending the "official" featured articles, and stopping people from using their administrative authority to circumvent the decisions, are very different things. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | :::::@JW: my understanding is that this is open to "civilians". @Tracy: Unfortunately, these are two different issues. Recommending the "official" featured articles, and stopping people from using their administrative authority to circumvent the decisions, are very different things. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::::No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ::::::No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| − | + | :::::::Excellent, Rob. Now, is there a rubric of some sort for featured articles?--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:59, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | |
==Sign up for Featured article committee== | ==Sign up for Featured article committee== | ||
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below. | Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below. | ||
* [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | * [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| − | * | + | * [[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 12:23, 17 July 2011 (EDT) |
* [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | * [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
*[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | *[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:59, July 17, 2011
Need some help
We need some help cleaing up the mainspace here. Then we can get to organizing a committee. Rob Smith 23:34, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- Good idea. --Joaquín Martínez 09:12, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think it would be great if this could be implemented again, so that Conservapedia can feature decent, educational, informative articles created by members of the project, instead of the semi-coherent ramblings of somebody who for all intents and purposes appears to be trying to harm Conservapedia's image. I mean, to go from some of the great articles listed here, to dribble about walruses and dancing girls... the mind boggles. TracyS 11:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Somebody want to begin archiving the past nominations in mainspace. Meanwhile I'm sure we'll get more signing up. Rob Smith 12:35, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Does one need to be an administrator to apply?--JamesWilson 12:45, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- @JW: my understanding is that this is open to "civilians". @Tracy: Unfortunately, these are two different issues. Recommending the "official" featured articles, and stopping people from using their administrative authority to circumvent the decisions, are very different things. SamHB 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this. Rob Smith 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Excellent, Rob. Now, is there a rubric of some sort for featured articles?--JamesWilson 13:59, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this. Rob Smith 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- @JW: my understanding is that this is open to "civilians". @Tracy: Unfortunately, these are two different issues. Recommending the "official" featured articles, and stopping people from using their administrative authority to circumvent the decisions, are very different things. SamHB 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Does one need to be an administrator to apply?--JamesWilson 12:45, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Somebody want to begin archiving the past nominations in mainspace. Meanwhile I'm sure we'll get more signing up. Rob Smith 12:35, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think it would be great if this could be implemented again, so that Conservapedia can feature decent, educational, informative articles created by members of the project, instead of the semi-coherent ramblings of somebody who for all intents and purposes appears to be trying to harm Conservapedia's image. I mean, to go from some of the great articles listed here, to dribble about walruses and dancing girls... the mind boggles. TracyS 11:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Sign up for Featured article committee
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below.
- TracyS 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- Joaquín Martínez 12:23, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- SamHB 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- JamesWilson 13:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT)