Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Featured articles"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Need some help: parameters)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
::::::No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::Excellent, Rob. Now, is there a rubric of some sort for featured articles?--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:59, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::::Excellent, Rob. Now, is there a rubric of some sort for featured articles?--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 13:59, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::::::Let's clean up the mainspace and take some nominations. I'm only helping out in these organizational phases. You guys vet the articles and make sure they're presentable. They probably should relate to some current, timely theme of interest to MainPage readers. It will take a sysop to place it at [[Template:Mainpageleft]], and we have one the committee. So an appropriate review process is in place for the Committee's recomendations.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:21, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 
==Sign up for Featured article committee==
 
==Sign up for Featured article committee==
 
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below.
 
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below.

Revision as of 18:21, July 17, 2011

Archives: 1

Need some help

We need some help cleaing up the mainspace here. Then we can get to organizing a committee. Rob Smith 23:34, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

Good idea. --Joaquín Martínez 09:12, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
I think it would be great if this could be implemented again, so that Conservapedia can feature decent, educational, informative articles created by members of the project, instead of the semi-coherent ramblings of somebody who for all intents and purposes appears to be trying to harm Conservapedia's image. I mean, to go from some of the great articles listed here, to dribble about walruses and dancing girls... the mind boggles. TracyS 11:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Somebody want to begin archiving the past nominations in mainspace. Meanwhile I'm sure we'll get more signing up. Rob Smith 12:35, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Does one need to be an administrator to apply?--JamesWilson 12:45, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
@JW: my understanding is that this is open to "civilians". @Tracy: Unfortunately, these are two different issues. Recommending the "official" featured articles, and stopping people from using their administrative authority to circumvent the decisions, are very different things. SamHB 13:48, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
No, there's been no objection. We need to get the ball moving on this. Rob Smith 13:57, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Excellent, Rob. Now, is there a rubric of some sort for featured articles?--JamesWilson 13:59, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Let's clean up the mainspace and take some nominations. I'm only helping out in these organizational phases. You guys vet the articles and make sure they're presentable. They probably should relate to some current, timely theme of interest to MainPage readers. It will take a sysop to place it at Template:Mainpageleft, and we have one the committee. So an appropriate review process is in place for the Committee's recomendations. Rob Smith 14:21, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Sign up for Featured article committee

Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below.