Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Controversial"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*<nowiki><noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude></nowiki>
 
*<nowiki><noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude></nowiki>
 
because otherwise, all pages this template is used on will be included in that category. This is the case for [[Talk:Church of Satan]] and [[Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics]] at the moment. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:47, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 
because otherwise, all pages this template is used on will be included in that category. This is the case for [[Talk:Church of Satan]] and [[Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics]] at the moment. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:47, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
:Yes, I think these were discussion pages a previous administrator wanted to keep an eye on rather than outright delete. We just haven't found a better category for them yet.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:50, July 17, 2011

</div>

  • Could somebody add one at the end of the template? Without it, the template messes up the entire page. -CSGuy 20:31, 16 November 2008 (EST)
Fixed. Philip J. Rayment 20:48, 19 November 2008 (EST)

Category:Conservapedia Administration

I think the last line should be changed from

  • [[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]

to

  • <noinclude>[[Category:Conservapedia Administration]]</noinclude>

because otherwise, all pages this template is used on will be included in that category. This is the case for Talk:Church of Satan and Talk:Homosexuality and Genetics at the moment. --Sid 3050 18:47, 17 July 2011 (EDT)

Yes, I think these were discussion pages a previous administrator wanted to keep an eye on rather than outright delete. We just haven't found a better category for them yet. Rob Smith 18:50, 17 July 2011 (EDT)