Difference between revisions of "Mystery:Why is England More Liberal than the United States?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(from talk page: the United States began as a rebellion against liberalism in England, both when the colonies were settled and by the American Revolution) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*the United States began as a rebellion against liberalism in England, both when the colonies were settled and by the [[American Revolution]] | *the United States began as a rebellion against liberalism in England, both when the colonies were settled and by the [[American Revolution]] | ||
[[Category:Mystery]] | [[Category:Mystery]] | ||
| + | *The welfare state in England is so thoroughly entrenched and used by people dependent on the government that any attempt by a conservative to reform it is met with hostility. | ||
Revision as of 23:06, July 17, 2011
Reasons for why England is substantially more liberal than the United States include:
- lack of federalism and decentralized government in England, thereby enabling a handful of liberals to exercise more influence and centralized power
- England lacks socially conservative intellectuals, perhaps due to its atheistic-controlled university system
- workers unions are far more powerful in England than in the United States
- gun control dominates England -- negating a healthy attitude of self-defense -- in contrast with the United States
- people in England actually believe in the theory of evolution, unlike most of the United States
- churches have been in sharp decline in England, causing people to worship government instead
- a state-run church that became a social bureaucracy over time
- lack of freedom of speech that fully protects criticism of public officials and everyone else
- the United States began as a rebellion against liberalism in England, both when the colonies were settled and by the American Revolution
- The welfare state in England is so thoroughly entrenched and used by people dependent on the government that any attempt by a conservative to reform it is met with hostility.