Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by KennyD (talk) to last revision by Conservative) |
(Undo revision 892767 by Conservative (talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;" | {| align=right border=2 cellspacing=0 style="border-width: 3px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;" | ||
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_2|Set 2 of Archives]] | | style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_2|Set 2 of Archives]] | ||
| Line 19: | Line 5: | ||
| style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_1|Set 1 of Archives]] | | style="text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;" | [[Talk:Theory_of_evolution/Archive_Set_1|Set 1 of Archives]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
| + | == Student Panel == | ||
| + | I have been bold and removed the Student Panel Decision. Now, before everybody is rushing to the Rollback and Ban buttons, allow me to explain why the text was utterly outdated and pretty much useless: | ||
| + | *"the article will remain protected indefinitely" - Yes, just like tons and tons of other articles. Big whoop. (This is a problem by itself, but one I won't tackle right here, right now.) | ||
| + | *"to protect it from inevitable vandalism" - .................right. | ||
| + | *"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way." - Aaaaand this is the main reason why I removed the decision: | ||
| + | **The Panel made the decision in April 2007. Right now, the earliest revision of the Evolution article is dated February 9, 2011. Without knowing what the April 2007 version looked like, what counts as a major change? | ||
| + | **Between the first and last visible revisions alone, the article gained ~10k - not a major change? To put the number into perspective, [[Date of the Exodus]] is smaller than the amount this article has grown. | ||
| + | **Those who have been around since back then know exactly that the article ''has'' changed in major ways since then. | ||
| + | *"Those who wish to assist in improving this article should submit proposed changes to the panel for review." - Too many issues to list here. I honestly don't think this applies (or ''should'' apply) anymore. | ||
| + | I hope there can be some discussion before I'm just bluntly reverted. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 17:44, 18 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| − | + | :As predicted Conservative reverted the above talk page comment without discussion. The evolution article is his own private article and no-one is allowed to edit it. Ever. It is of no consequence that it is an embarrassment to this site and is full of silly propaganda and irrelevant nonsense. No-one else will ever edit the article. Undestand that and you will get on fine. Question it and you will reverted and blocked. --[[User:KennyD|KennyD]] 00:00, 24 July 2011 (EDT) | |
| − | |||
Revision as of 04:03, July 24, 2011
| Set 2 of Archives |
| Set 1 of Archives |
Student Panel
I have been bold and removed the Student Panel Decision. Now, before everybody is rushing to the Rollback and Ban buttons, allow me to explain why the text was utterly outdated and pretty much useless:
- "the article will remain protected indefinitely" - Yes, just like tons and tons of other articles. Big whoop. (This is a problem by itself, but one I won't tackle right here, right now.)
- "to protect it from inevitable vandalism" - .................right.
- "We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way." - Aaaaand this is the main reason why I removed the decision:
- The Panel made the decision in April 2007. Right now, the earliest revision of the Evolution article is dated February 9, 2011. Without knowing what the April 2007 version looked like, what counts as a major change?
- Between the first and last visible revisions alone, the article gained ~10k - not a major change? To put the number into perspective, Date of the Exodus is smaller than the amount this article has grown.
- Those who have been around since back then know exactly that the article has changed in major ways since then.
- "Those who wish to assist in improving this article should submit proposed changes to the panel for review." - Too many issues to list here. I honestly don't think this applies (or should apply) anymore.
I hope there can be some discussion before I'm just bluntly reverted. --Sid 3050 17:44, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
- As predicted Conservative reverted the above talk page comment without discussion. The evolution article is his own private article and no-one is allowed to edit it. Ever. It is of no consequence that it is an embarrassment to this site and is full of silly propaganda and irrelevant nonsense. No-one else will ever edit the article. Undestand that and you will get on fine. Question it and you will reverted and blocked. --KennyD 00:00, 24 July 2011 (EDT)