Difference between revisions of "Talk:Operation Fast and Furious"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
I'm sort of indifferent about it, but wondering if anyone else feels like "Operation" should be a part of the page title. I guess it would be an easy update if others like it. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:00, 27 July 2011 (EDT)
 
I'm sort of indifferent about it, but wondering if anyone else feels like "Operation" should be a part of the page title. I guess it would be an easy update if others like it. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 17:00, 27 July 2011 (EDT)
−
:I could ee putting it under Operation Fast and Furious.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 17:04, 27 July 2011 (EDT)
+
:I could see putting it under Operation Fast and Furious.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 17:04, 27 July 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:04, July 27, 2011

This Talk Page is for Discussion Focused on the Improvement of the Corresponding Article
  • Your post should not deviate from the aforementioned purpose; this is not a page for debate on the topic.
  • Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~).
  • Please place new text under old text; click here to add a new section.
Archives:
None
For article guidelines please see the Commandments and Guidelines

Operation Fast and Furious

Should the Fast and Furious title of the main page stay as-is ,or would it make sense to move it to Operation Fast and Furious?

I'm sort of indifferent about it, but wondering if anyone else feels like "Operation" should be a part of the page title. I guess it would be an easy update if others like it. DerekE 17:00, 27 July 2011 (EDT)

I could see putting it under Operation Fast and Furious.--JamesWilson 17:04, 27 July 2011 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Operation_Fast_and_Furious&oldid=893880"