Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deadbeat President"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Obama's has signed the law he threatened to veto, and the editor who created this article has been active elsewhere (requesting expanded user rights) but has done nothing to update, expand, improve maintain, or correct the error he put into this page. Looks like parody, to me. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:05, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | :Obama's has signed the law he threatened to veto, and the editor who created this article has been active elsewhere (requesting expanded user rights) but has done nothing to update, expand, improve maintain, or correct the error he put into this page. Looks like parody, to me. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:05, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Ah, I see. I quick scan of his recent edits doesn't exactly scream 'parodist', but I'm sure you've done your research before making such a serious charge. Thanks for the explanation. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:32, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ::Ah, I see. I quick scan of his recent edits doesn't exactly scream 'parodist', but I'm sure you've done your research before making such a serious charge. Thanks for the explanation. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:32, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::On further study, I'm inclined to agree with you. I've notified the editor out of courtesy; hopefully he'll explain himself. [[User:Jcw|Jcw]] 16:53, 5 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:53, August 5, 2011
Speedy?
I'm afraid it's not clear to me how this article qualifies for speedy deletion. Anyone care to elaborate? Jcw 15:43, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- Obama's has signed the law he threatened to veto, and the editor who created this article has been active elsewhere (requesting expanded user rights) but has done nothing to update, expand, improve maintain, or correct the error he put into this page. Looks like parody, to me. Rob Smith 16:05, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- Ah, I see. I quick scan of his recent edits doesn't exactly scream 'parodist', but I'm sure you've done your research before making such a serious charge. Thanks for the explanation. Jcw 16:32, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- On further study, I'm inclined to agree with you. I've notified the editor out of courtesy; hopefully he'll explain himself. Jcw 16:53, 5 August 2011 (EDT)