Conservapedia talk:Writing plan

Good to see the rule under which I was blocked finally being written.--Tom Moore^{fiat justitia ruat coelum} 14:38, 27 May 2008 (EDT)

I'll note that I tried asking a user to do this once on Wikipedia. My request was quickly shot down with the edit summary "rv disruptive trolling (which won't result in the offender being blocked, of course)". My attempt to enforce this backfired.

Feh. --Elkman 00:26, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Is this a new Commandment? Human 02:38, 31 August 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps someone could better illustrate what a writing plan is. I got blocked for asking what one was, when it was demanded of me, and this article doesn't make it clear at all. --RonAbdul 14:38, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Examples?

I think it would be helpful if this page linked to some examples of well-received writing plans, to give some guidance as to the expectations. Do any such examples exist? -- I don't think in my time at CP I ever saw anyone actually submit a writing plan, they tended to just get banned. --MarkGall 13:59, 6 August 2011 (EDT)

It's similiar to 90/10; the idea is to cut down discussion and get an editor focued on mainspace contribs. Ed is the only sysop I've ever seen do this [1], but sysops do not have the power to issue instructions to editors anymore. Rob Smith 14:50, 6 August 2011 (EDT)