Difference between revisions of "Talk:Static universe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) (Created page with "alternative explanation for CBR: http://www.icr.org/article/bumps-big-bang/ ~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
alternative explanation for CBR: http://www.icr.org/article/bumps-big-bang/ [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:16, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | alternative explanation for CBR: http://www.icr.org/article/bumps-big-bang/ [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:16, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The lack of bumps in the CBR doesn't disprove the big bang; it disproves the supposed timescale of the big bang. The truth is that the big bang didn't happen billions of years ago; it was much more recent. The lack of bumps in the CBR proves that the galaxies didn't form through naturalistic processes over billions of years, but were divinely created in a much shorter time period. [[User:EveryKnee|EveryKnee]] 23:25, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:25, August 10, 2011
alternative explanation for CBR: http://www.icr.org/article/bumps-big-bang/ Conservative 22:16, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
The lack of bumps in the CBR doesn't disprove the big bang; it disproves the supposed timescale of the big bang. The truth is that the big bang didn't happen billions of years ago; it was much more recent. The lack of bumps in the CBR proves that the galaxies didn't form through naturalistic processes over billions of years, but were divinely created in a much shorter time period. EveryKnee 23:25, 9 August 2011 (EDT)