Difference between revisions of "Debate: Should we criminalize homosexuality?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cats)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
In order to save our economy, we must criminalize homosexuality.  Punishing them by death is a bit too extreme, as we Americans need to show that we are more moral than those who punish homosexuality through death.  Instead, I suggest we ''deport'' them any communist/socialist state (Cuba, Venezuela, China, and North Korea).  These countries are definitely more tolerant towards their gay population since there is never any communist state that criminalizes homosexuality.  Or maybe we should send the entire gay population in America to Japan.  Since many anime portray homosexuals in a more positive light and Japan happens to be the gay friendliest country in the world, we deport homosexuals there instead.--[[User:JacobMS|JacobMS]] 23:42, 5 July 2011 (EDT)
 
In order to save our economy, we must criminalize homosexuality.  Punishing them by death is a bit too extreme, as we Americans need to show that we are more moral than those who punish homosexuality through death.  Instead, I suggest we ''deport'' them any communist/socialist state (Cuba, Venezuela, China, and North Korea).  These countries are definitely more tolerant towards their gay population since there is never any communist state that criminalizes homosexuality.  Or maybe we should send the entire gay population in America to Japan.  Since many anime portray homosexuals in a more positive light and Japan happens to be the gay friendliest country in the world, we deport homosexuals there instead.--[[User:JacobMS|JacobMS]] 23:42, 5 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:I am afraid to say that unfortunately JacobMS, you seem to not understand the difference between correlation and causation.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:22, 6 July 2011 (EDT)
 
:I am afraid to say that unfortunately JacobMS, you seem to not understand the difference between correlation and causation.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:22, 6 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
Christianity clearly prohibits homosexuality, and since America is a CHRISTIAN country, we need to outlaw homosexuality to protect the country from sin.  ---[[User:DennisRifkin|DennisR]] 07:32, 14 August 2011 (EDT)
  
 
==No==
 
==No==

Revision as of 11:32, August 14, 2011

Yes

I believe homosexuals are causing our economy to decline. Just look at India, a country that barely tolerates homosexuality, and it's GDP is steadily increasing and becoming an economic. Many other countries like Portugal, Greece, Netherlands, Sweden, and Spain are suffering economically and they have either legalized same-sex marriage or have more liberal "gay rights." And many empires have collapsed due to the acceptance of homosexuality (Roman Empire, Mongol Empire, and the British Empire).

In order to save our economy, we must criminalize homosexuality. Punishing them by death is a bit too extreme, as we Americans need to show that we are more moral than those who punish homosexuality through death. Instead, I suggest we deport them any communist/socialist state (Cuba, Venezuela, China, and North Korea). These countries are definitely more tolerant towards their gay population since there is never any communist state that criminalizes homosexuality. Or maybe we should send the entire gay population in America to Japan. Since many anime portray homosexuals in a more positive light and Japan happens to be the gay friendliest country in the world, we deport homosexuals there instead.--JacobMS 23:42, 5 July 2011 (EDT)

I am afraid to say that unfortunately JacobMS, you seem to not understand the difference between correlation and causation. --DamianJohn 01:22, 6 July 2011 (EDT)

Christianity clearly prohibits homosexuality, and since America is a CHRISTIAN country, we need to outlaw homosexuality to protect the country from sin. ---DennisR 07:32, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

No

The last thing we need in this country are more liberal, nanny state policies like this. The only thing criminalization of homosexuality would accomplish is more spending on law enforcement and increased governmental control of our lives. There would also be no way to enforce it, since making love in the street is already illegal, and homosexuals could just claim public displays of affection as political statements protected by the first amendment, which would clog our court systems even worse than they already are. There is no objective way to prove homosexuality outside the bedroom, so that throws a giant wrench into any possibility of enforcement.

Government control is a slippery slope. It starts with the criminalization of deviant sexual practices, and before you know it, the government is controlling who breeds with who and when. Homosexuality may be sinful and immoral, but it is the lesser of two evils. FCapra 00:19, 6 July 2011 (EDT)