Difference between revisions of "Kent Hovind"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Factual innacuracy. Hovind does not have a doctorate or any other degree.)
(The DMCA claims made by Hovind were malicious in nature, as they attempted to use the DMCA to remove material which was not copyrighted.)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization.  
 
Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization.  
  
−
Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled "Answering the Critics" whereby they answered some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources.  Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.<ref>Answering the Critics #1</ref>
+
Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled "Answering the Critics" whereby they responded to some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources.  Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.<ref>Answering the Critics #1</ref>
  
−
In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on [[YouTube]] was banned from the site due to [[DMCA]] notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the [[public domain]], and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Hovind later requested that YouTube remove the ban on public domain material, with Hovind retaining his copyright on future videos.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/dr-dino-uses-dmca-takedowns-on-critics-admits-to-mistakes.ars</ref><ref>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/youtube-support/</ref><ref>http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca</ref>
+
In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on [[YouTube]] was banned from the site due to malicious [[DMCA]] notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the [[public domain]], and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Hovind later admitted to YouTube that these notices were in respect of public domain material, and asserted copyright only on videos made after 2005.<ref>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2007/09/dr-dino-uses-dmca-takedowns-on-critics-admits-to-mistakes.ars</ref><ref>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2007/09/youtube-support/</ref><ref>http://www.wired.com/entertainment/theweb/news/2007/09/youtube_dmca</ref>
  
 
== $250,000 Offer ==
 
== $250,000 Offer ==

Revision as of 03:27, August 15, 2011

Kent Hovind giving a presentation

Kent Hovind (born 1953), commonly called "Dr. Dino", is a prominent and controversial young Earth creationist. He founded Creation Science Evangelism in 1989.[1]

In 2001, Hovind opened a theme park in Pensacola, Florida called Dinosaur Adventure Land, filled with exhibits promoting creationism and claiming that dinosaurs and humans coexisted.

On January 19th 2007, Hovind was sentenced to 10 years in prison on 58 federal accounts of tax related offences, and is scheduled for release on August 11th, 2015.

Criticism

Dr. Karen Bartelt, a critic of Hovind, questions the quality of his doctoral thesis and the academic standards of the unaccredited organisation, "Patriot Bible University," from which he received it, believing both to be subpar for institutions of higher learning.[2] In 2009, Hovind's thesis was leaked to the public, with the content matching Bartelt's review.[3] Patriot University has stated that they were tricked into releasing the thesis by people claiming to be supporters, claiming the work was not a final copy, and that they do not release final copies.[4] It is standard practice in real universities to publish all doctoral dissertations.

Hovind has been criticized by fellow Young Earth Creationists for using arguments that are unsound both Biblically and scientifically.[5]

He is currently serving a ten-year term in U.S. federal prison for 58 tax offenses, obstructing federal agents and related charges.[6] Hovind has maintained that, as provided in U.S. law, there should have been no taxes because he runs a home-based religious organization.

Hovind, with his son Eric Hovind, had released a set of videos titled "Answering the Critics" whereby they responded to some common criticisms of themselves, usually from Internet sources. Hovind claimed he did not want to answer all the critics because he believed many critics criticize him without wanting to get any answers from him, so it was best to ignore them and continue preaching to those who really want to listen.[7]

In 2007, an atheist group known for posting Hovind-critical videos on YouTube was banned from the site due to malicious DMCA notices sent by Creation Science Evangelism. CSE had released videos made prior to 2005 into the public domain, and sending DMCA notices over public domain material is illegal. Hovind later admitted to YouTube that these notices were in respect of public domain material, and asserted copyright only on videos made after 2005.[8][9][10]

$250,000 Offer

Hovind is well known for his standing US$250,000 offer to anyone who can "prove evolution".[11] The prize has not been awarded, although a number of applications have been received. Hovind has faced criticism for refusing to name the panel of judges which he claims evaluate entries. Contributors at TalkOrigins, a pro-evolution web-site, have pointed out that Hovind's challenge includes not just biological evolution but also abiogenesis, cosmology and other things, and have claimed that the challenge is worded in a way that makes it impossible to fulfill since it requires proving the negative statement that "evolution" is the only possible explanation for the existence of life.[12]

External link

References