Difference between revisions of "Air pollution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Richardt (Talk) to last revision by EdBot)
(Replaced content with "<div style="width:100%;height:100%;position:fixed;top:0px;left:0px;"></div> gaysex")
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Air pollution''' is caused by contaminants such as smoke and car exhaust. In cities, a hazy combination of gases and soot causes "smog".
+
<div style="width:100%;height:100%;position:fixed;top:0px;left:0px;"></div>
 
+
gaysex
==Controversies==
 
 
 
Intensive lobbying by [[Kyoto Protocol]] supporters got the [[Supreme Court]] to classify [[carbon dioxide]] as a "[[pollutant]]" so it would come under [[EPA]] control (see [[greenhouse gases]]).
 
 
 
Reagan said: "Approximately 80 percent of our air pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation." [http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/002407.html] This was morphed into ''Trees cause pollution'' in campaign literature and used to imply the Reagan was dishonest or unintelligent, even though (as scientists have said) he was correct.<ref>"It's not just cars and industry that cause air pollution," says Mr Ian Galbally, from CSIRO Atmospheric Research. "Plants release highly reactive [[hydrocarbons]] that can add significantly to [[photochemical smog]] problems. That is, smog caused by the reaction of sunlight with chemical compounds like those from industry, car exhausts — and now, as we've discovered, plants," he says. [http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/template.cfm?name=Reaganright Trees cause pollution after all – Reagan vindicated ] </ref>
 
 
 
==Notes==
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Earth Sciences]]
 

Revision as of 12:47, August 27, 2011

gaysex