Changes

Undo revision 907670 by UndoSclaf (talk)
Line 23: Line 23:  
: They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together.  One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
 
: They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together.  One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels.  It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
    
== Demosthenes ==
 
== Demosthenes ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,924

edits