5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: − − :::But the concept of "brahmin" appears more often, and thus is more important, than the other caste levels. It's even a common term in English, as in referring to wealthy (and typically liberal) families in Boston.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:18, 30 August 2011 (EDT)
Talk:World History Study Guide to 1648 (view source)
Revision as of 17:16, August 30, 2011
, 17:16, August 30, 2011Undo revision 907655 by Aschlafly (talk)
: They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
: They do not seem worth 2 full entries, and they are easier to learn together. One could be moved to honors, but it seems unhelpful to separate the terms.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:57, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
::Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
::Actually, why not eliminate brahmin altogether? It is already defined somewhat under "caste", and the other three caste categories are not included in the term list - there's no reason to single out brahmin. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 23:15, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
== Demosthenes ==
== Demosthenes ==