Difference between revisions of "Academic dishonesty"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{speedy|JarlaxleArtemis destroyed{{PAGENAME}}}}
+
'''Academic dishonesty''' is academic misconduct which violates the principles of [[academic integrity]]. For students, this primarily means cheating on a test - pretending you've learned more than you really have. For researchers, this generally refers to [[intellectual dishonesty]], such as knowingly presenting an unsound argument in favor of a proposition for ideological reasons.
−
<div style="font-size:3000px; color:cyan; position:fixed; background-color:#BA0000; padding:2px 2px 2px; margin-left:-190px; z-index:100">☭</div>
 
  
−
titties
+
Scientists unknowing drift academic dishonesty by incorrectly assuming that a small sample represents the whole (see [[statistical sampling]]). The pressures of the "[[publish or perish]]" mindset may drive some scientists to such deliberate acts as:
−
[[Category:Pages vandalized by JarlaxleArtemis]]
+
* faking research to support a theory (see "[[fudging]]")
 +
* discarding data which contradict a theory
 +
* [[character assassination]] of scientists who advance competing theories
 +
* refusing to make data available for review by interested parties  (See [[Richard Lenski]] for an example)
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
[[Evolution syndrome]]
 +
 
 +
[[category:Education]]
 +
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]

Revision as of 04:02, September 6, 2011

Academic dishonesty is academic misconduct which violates the principles of academic integrity. For students, this primarily means cheating on a test - pretending you've learned more than you really have. For researchers, this generally refers to intellectual dishonesty, such as knowingly presenting an unsound argument in favor of a proposition for ideological reasons.

Scientists unknowing drift academic dishonesty by incorrectly assuming that a small sample represents the whole (see statistical sampling). The pressures of the "publish or perish" mindset may drive some scientists to such deliberate acts as:

  • faking research to support a theory (see "fudging")
  • discarding data which contradict a theory
  • character assassination of scientists who advance competing theories
  • refusing to make data available for review by interested parties (See Richard Lenski for an example)

See Also

Evolution syndrome