Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Please show me where there is a credible movement with the support of the liberal political/intellectual establishment that is campaigning to legalize marriage involving children or animals. If you do not provide a credible reference, I will revert the edit in 24 hours. Thanks. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 15:18, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | Please show me where there is a credible movement with the support of the liberal political/intellectual establishment that is campaigning to legalize marriage involving children or animals. If you do not provide a credible reference, I will revert the edit in 24 hours. Thanks. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 15:18, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
:This is a dictionary project, it doesn't rely on references, it relies on the realities of the true meaning of words and the liberal agenda. Liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want, they are very good at hiding their real agenda, but many conservative politicians have picked up on it. Liberals like NAMBLA promote marriage between adults and children, Muslims want polygamy, homosexuals want gay marriage and some liberal Furrys want marriage between animal and man. Open your eyes. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 15:45, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | :This is a dictionary project, it doesn't rely on references, it relies on the realities of the true meaning of words and the liberal agenda. Liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want, they are very good at hiding their real agenda, but many conservative politicians have picked up on it. Liberals like NAMBLA promote marriage between adults and children, Muslims want polygamy, homosexuals want gay marriage and some liberal Furrys want marriage between animal and man. Open your eyes. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 15:45, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way a dictionary works, but they very much do rely on references, namely by giving documented evidence of words being used in a particular manner. [[User:BrentH|BrentH]] 15:51, 6 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:51, September 6, 2011
"liberals want to define marriage as anything they want"
Please show me where there is a credible movement with the support of the liberal political/intellectual establishment that is campaigning to legalize marriage involving children or animals. If you do not provide a credible reference, I will revert the edit in 24 hours. Thanks. BrentH 15:18, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
- This is a dictionary project, it doesn't rely on references, it relies on the realities of the true meaning of words and the liberal agenda. Liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want, they are very good at hiding their real agenda, but many conservative politicians have picked up on it. Liberals like NAMBLA promote marriage between adults and children, Muslims want polygamy, homosexuals want gay marriage and some liberal Furrys want marriage between animal and man. Open your eyes. --CraigF 15:45, 6 September 2011 (EDT)
- Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way a dictionary works, but they very much do rely on references, namely by giving documented evidence of words being used in a particular manner. BrentH 15:51, 6 September 2011 (EDT)