Difference between revisions of "User talk:Horace/List of suspected communist moles"
(I think this is a bit too far) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
How can anyone be too conservative? Few people would be pathetic enough to spend their time improving this website simply to vandalise it - they'll probably end up doing more good than harm, for their vandalism will be wiped out quickly but the legit edits they added to blend in will last a long time. Then again, these are communists we're talking about. | How can anyone be too conservative? Few people would be pathetic enough to spend their time improving this website simply to vandalise it - they'll probably end up doing more good than harm, for their vandalism will be wiped out quickly but the legit edits they added to blend in will last a long time. Then again, these are communists we're talking about. | ||
| − | Also, no, I'm not pulling your leg on my debate page. | + | Also, no, I'm not pulling your leg on my debate page.--[[User:C for Conservative|C for Conservative]] 09:09, 7 April 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 13:09, April 7, 2007
Dear Horace, CWilson may be a communist mole. I suggest you keep a watch on him.
- "Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;" (Hebrews 12:15)
JC 07:36, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
- Tsumetai (talk • contribs • count) looks rather suspicious to me, Tovarich. Tsumetai 07:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Thank you. As you know, the price of freedom is eternal vigilence (or is it $1.58? I get those two mixed up). I just hope that these pinkos get the message that they're not welcome. I'll certainly take a look at this CWilson character and that JC seems to have a highly suspicious name. --Horace 09:10, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
Inappropriate page
Please remove User talk:Horace/List of suspected communist moles. There is no need for it.
- There is also no need for Richard's idiotic list. I suggest you start poking his project instead - this list is just a reaction. --Sid 3050 14:40, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
- For the record, I agree with Horace.NSmyth 16:56, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
This proves McCarthy was right!
See the place is just teeming with communist moles! Tmtoulouse 21:20, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
- I shall have to keep on my toes! Who'd 'a' guessed it? Jolly Joe McCarthy turns out to be right! The place is crawling with them. Well, I for one will be redoubling my efforts here. I notice that there is some sort of panel brewing. I wonder if editors could be called before them for questioning about their unAmerican activities. --Horace 22:54, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I think this is a bit too far
How can anyone be too conservative? Few people would be pathetic enough to spend their time improving this website simply to vandalise it - they'll probably end up doing more good than harm, for their vandalism will be wiped out quickly but the legit edits they added to blend in will last a long time. Then again, these are communists we're talking about.
Also, no, I'm not pulling your leg on my debate page.--C for Conservative 09:09, 7 April 2007 (EDT)