Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and bestiality"
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Conservative, could you please provide some support that Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 18:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | Conservative, could you please provide some support that Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 18:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::I cited a source plus in case you are forgetting you are on the information superhighway. I suggest going to a search engine and typing in the words Peter Singer. The reason I am taking you to task is that I think you are being lazy and/or contentious. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:01, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ::I cited a source plus in case you are forgetting you are on the information superhighway. I suggest going to a search engine and typing in the words Peter Singer. The reason I am taking you to task is that I think you are being lazy and/or contentious. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:01, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Please avoid being insulting, Conservative. I did actually googled it but I found nothing except from anti-atheists websites (like creation.com) which cannot really be considered as objective on this matter.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:15, September 23, 2011
I don't even know what to say about this article...
I was going to leave Conservapedia but when I see this kind of article, I just can't. Conservative, do you know that you are becoming very offensive?
I heard that you were always eager to debate. I have a lot of questions about christianity & atheism that I would like to discuss. Would you be willing to answer my questions ?--ARamis 16:56, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
Absolutely revolting. Andy Schlafly, please put an end to this.
Disgusted. As a Christian I am reviled by this. There are no links that support what this Peter Singer said, merely heresy from another website which doesn't state its sources. Then it is taken to paint a group of people in the same stripe. Absolutely immoral, unsupported filth. MaxFletcher 17:14, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- What's next? Atheism and masturbation? Oh wait, masturbation is a naughty word - even the spam-filter doesn't like it. Bestiality should be added to the list! RonLar 17:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah this is really bad, not that anything else this user has done has been that much better. -1 for lack of fatty fat fat ad hominems and lack of bunny photos. --MarkN85 17:20, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I suggest Atheism and Mass Murder or Atheism and Racism. Oh wait, it already exists ! That's just great encyclopedic content ! And so objective by the way !--ARamis 17:22, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I saw your response and noticed that you started it off with "I suggest..." so I stopped reading it, but here's an article on flying cats instead. --MarkN85 17:23, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- there is no support for this claim - this user is trolling. Lowering the tone immensely. MaxFletcher 17:24, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- User:conservative is trying too hard--CamilleT 18:32, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- It was incredibly easy to find 4 pages of relevant material on this topic. Given the depravity of atheism this is not entirely surprising. As far as what is next, I have not given the topic or timing of my next article on atheism although I have alluded to an upcoming article on atheism to a Conservapedian. Conservative 22:11, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- User:conservative is trying too hard--CamilleT 18:32, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- there is no support for this claim - this user is trolling. Lowering the tone immensely. MaxFletcher 17:24, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I saw your response and noticed that you started it off with "I suggest..." so I stopped reading it, but here's an article on flying cats instead. --MarkN85 17:23, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I suggest Atheism and Mass Murder or Atheism and Racism. Oh wait, it already exists ! That's just great encyclopedic content ! And so objective by the way !--ARamis 17:22, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Yeah this is really bad, not that anything else this user has done has been that much better. -1 for lack of fatty fat fat ad hominems and lack of bunny photos. --MarkN85 17:20, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
Support ?
Conservative, could you please provide some support that Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality ?--ARamis 18:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I cited a source plus in case you are forgetting you are on the information superhighway. I suggest going to a search engine and typing in the words Peter Singer. The reason I am taking you to task is that I think you are being lazy and/or contentious. Conservative 22:01, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Please avoid being insulting, Conservative. I did actually googled it but I found nothing except from anti-atheists websites (like creation.com) which cannot really be considered as objective on this matter.--ARamis 22:15, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- I cited a source plus in case you are forgetting you are on the information superhighway. I suggest going to a search engine and typing in the words Peter Singer. The reason I am taking you to task is that I think you are being lazy and/or contentious. Conservative 22:01, 22 September 2011 (EDT)