Difference between revisions of "Guelzo"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cats)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"Although some scholars have argued that the Proclamation had, in fact, no legal effect and freed no slaves, Professor Guelzo argues persuasively that it was and remains the pivotal event of the Civil War and the single most important factor in the destruction of slavery." [http://www.amazon.com/Lincolns-Emancipation-Proclamation-Slavery-America/dp/0743221826/ref=sr_1_1/002-6991472-4948010?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1182550444&sr=8-1]
 
"Although some scholars have argued that the Proclamation had, in fact, no legal effect and freed no slaves, Professor Guelzo argues persuasively that it was and remains the pivotal event of the Civil War and the single most important factor in the destruction of slavery." [http://www.amazon.com/Lincolns-Emancipation-Proclamation-Slavery-America/dp/0743221826/ref=sr_1_1/002-6991472-4948010?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1182550444&sr=8-1]
 
[[Category:Slavery]]
 
[[Category:Slavery]]
−
[[Category:American Civil War]]
+
[[Category:American Civil War]]!

Revision as of 19:39, September 23, 2011

"Although some scholars have argued that the Proclamation had, in fact, no legal effect and freed no slaves, Professor Guelzo argues persuasively that it was and remains the pivotal event of the Civil War and the single most important factor in the destruction of slavery." [1]!