Difference between revisions of "David Allen Green"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Commentary on Richard Dawkins ==
 
== Commentary on Richard Dawkins ==
  
−
Commenting on [[Elevatorgate]] a scandal involving Richard Dawkins, Green said he believed Dawkins was a [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]</ref> In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref>  
+
Commenting on [[Elevatorgate]], a scandal involving [[Richard Dawkins]], Green said he believed Dawkins was a [[sexism|sexist]].<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Stateman - 06 July 2011]</ref> In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."<ref>[http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/david-allen-green/2011/07/richard-dawkins-chewing-gum Sharing a lift with Richard Dawkins by David Allen Green - New Statesman - 06 July 2011]</ref>  
  
 
See also:  
 
See also:  

Revision as of 22:00, September 24, 2011

David Allen Green is a British lawyer and writer as well as a legal correspondent for the New Statesman and the blog as "Jack of Kent". Green is a skeptic who helps run Westminster Skeptics.[1]

Commentary on Richard Dawkins

Commenting on Elevatorgate, a scandal involving Richard Dawkins, Green said he believed Dawkins was a sexist.[2] In addition, Green wrote: "Can Richard Dawkins still credibly pose as a champion of rational thinking and an evidence-based approach? In my opinion, he certainly cannot, at least not in the way he did before."[3]

See also:

References