Difference between revisions of "Mazurek v. Armstrong"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing abortions. This decision ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on logic, and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. | + | In '''Mazurek v. Armstrong''', 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing [[abortion]]s. This decision was based on [[logic]], and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule. |
[[Category:abortion]] | [[Category:abortion]] | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 00:43, September 26, 2011
In Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968 (1997), the U.S. Supreme Court held that it is constitutional to prohibit non-physicians from doing abortions. This decision was based on logic, and did not find it appropriate to consider whether other medical professionals could an abortion as safely as a physician, or how much prices for abortions may increase due to the physician-only rule.