Difference between revisions of "Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm inclined to disagree. "Wackypedia" conveys an important and valid point that merely calling it "Wikipedia" would not. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 21 December 2006 (EST) | Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm inclined to disagree. "Wackypedia" conveys an important and valid point that merely calling it "Wikipedia" would not. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:54, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up! | ||
| + | [[Will N.]] | ||
Revision as of 15:51, January 6, 2007
I think that we should call the page "Wikipedia."
Tim,
Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm inclined to disagree. "Wackypedia" conveys an important and valid point that merely calling it "Wikipedia" would not. --Aschlafly 22:54, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up! Will N.