Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberalism and bestiality"
(→Ok...: new section) |
(→Ok...) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Who cares what position Larry Singer hold? The first line includes a bunch of information that is nothing but a guilt by association fallacy, something I've noticed a lot of in Conservapedia. So, one member of a group believes this, this, this, and this. SO WHAT? That's one individual, not necessarily true of every person who belongs to said groups. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 21:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT) | Who cares what position Larry Singer hold? The first line includes a bunch of information that is nothing but a guilt by association fallacy, something I've noticed a lot of in Conservapedia. So, one member of a group believes this, this, this, and this. SO WHAT? That's one individual, not necessarily true of every person who belongs to said groups. [[User:GiveMeLiberty|GiveMeLiberty]] 21:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :You're wasting your breath. --[[User:GuntherR|GuntherR]] 21:09, 7 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:09, October 8, 2011
Wow, it's going better and better
70 articles talking about bestiality, and 7 with bestiality in the title!
Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--ARamis 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
Fantastic Article
This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia. However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected. I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages. Could it be temporarily unlocked? -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
"All liberals are atheists"
I did not know this </sarcasm>. Please don't blindly follow Ann Coulter. Just because a majority appears a certain way, doesn't mean you can group them all into one conglomerate. All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. Aschlafly agrees that not all liberals are atheists. ~ JonG ~ 01:23, 28 September 2011 (EDT)
Atheism and Liberalism aren't like rectangles and squares, because while it is true that not all liberals are atheists, the same is true the other way around. My best friend from grade school was an atheist with many conservative positions, such as being against Gun Control, liberal taxes, and being anti-abortion. --SpenserL 00:39, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
- You are employing the Fallacy of exclusion because you are not mentioning the Princeton information. Also, in case you are not aware: Harvard, Princeton and Yale are often considered the 3 top academic schools in America and they also have a liberal bent. Conservative 02:25, 1 October 2011 (EDT)
- In addition, all the European countries I cited are liberal. Conservative 09:44, 6 October 2011 (EDT)
"...in wake of homosexual marriage being legalized in France."
Homosexual marriage is illegal in France. ScottDG 19:40, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
Ok...
Bestiality is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The atheist philosopher Peter Singer defends the practice of bestiality (as well as abortion, infanticide and euthanasia)
Who cares what position Larry Singer hold? The first line includes a bunch of information that is nothing but a guilt by association fallacy, something I've noticed a lot of in Conservapedia. So, one member of a group believes this, this, this, and this. SO WHAT? That's one individual, not necessarily true of every person who belongs to said groups. GiveMeLiberty 21:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
- You're wasting your breath. --GuntherR 21:09, 7 October 2011 (EDT)