Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Just as an a quick aside should the main definition read "denial of the existence of <u>a</u> God and/or Gods?" [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:08, 14 November 2011 (EST) | Just as an a quick aside should the main definition read "denial of the existence of <u>a</u> God and/or Gods?" [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:08, 14 November 2011 (EST) | ||
:I would have made the change but it appears I can't. Anyone? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:00, 15 November 2011 (EST) | :I would have made the change but it appears I can't. Anyone? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:00, 15 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| − | ::Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. | + | ::Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. Plus, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST) |
Revision as of 21:20, November 15, 2011
| Set 2 of Archives |
| Set 1 of Archives |
Definition
Just as an a quick aside should the main definition read "denial of the existence of a God and/or Gods?" MaxFletcher 18:08, 14 November 2011 (EST)
- I would have made the change but it appears I can't. Anyone? MaxFletcher 16:00, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. Plus, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. Conservative 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST)