Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added first one) |
m |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Nov. 28, 2009 | |Nov. 28, 2009 | ||
| − | | | + | |[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]: "the theory fails" |
|clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | |clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | ||
|the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | |the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | ||
Revision as of 00:18, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples ininclude:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | November 2011 |