Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia proven right"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples | + | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include: |
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
![[liberal]] claptrap | ![[liberal]] claptrap | ||
!Result | !Result | ||
| − | !Date of | + | !Date of Result |
|- | |- | ||
|Nov. 28, 2009 | |Nov. 28, 2009 | ||
Revision as of 00:19, November 20, 2011
Conservapedia content has often been proven right, even with respect to statements that dimwitted liberals have ridiculed. Examples include:
| Date | Conservapedia statement | liberal claptrap | Result | Date of Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov. 28, 2009 | Counterexamples to Relativity: "the theory fails" | clueless liberals insisted the theory must be true regardless of counterexamples | the basic assumption of the theory -- that nothing can go faster than the speed of light -- is disproved repeatedly by an experiment | November 2011 |