Difference between revisions of "User talk:CasparRH"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Useful links
(reply) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::What was "ideological"? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 22:48, 29 November 2011 (EST) | ::What was "ideological"? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 22:48, 29 November 2011 (EST) | ||
:::"CONSERVAPEDIA COMMANDMENTS... 1. Everything you post must be true and verifiable.... 2. Always cite and give credit to your sources...." | :::"CONSERVAPEDIA COMMANDMENTS... 1. Everything you post must be true and verifiable.... 2. Always cite and give credit to your sources...." | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::Right, but the best approach is to find and add such a cite, rather than simply tag a statement.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:58, 29 November 2011 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 03:58, November 30, 2011
Welcome!
Hello, CasparRH, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, CasparRH!
--JamesWilson 10:24, 11 August 2011 (EDT)
- Ideological tagging of statements in entries is disfavored here, and will likely result in a reversion of the edit.--Andy Schlafly 22:47, 29 November 2011 (EST)
- What was "ideological"? CasparRH 22:48, 29 November 2011 (EST)
- "CONSERVAPEDIA COMMANDMENTS... 1. Everything you post must be true and verifiable.... 2. Always cite and give credit to your sources...."
- What was "ideological"? CasparRH 22:48, 29 November 2011 (EST)
- Right, but the best approach is to find and add such a cite, rather than simply tag a statement.--Andy Schlafly 22:58, 29 November 2011 (EST)