Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Darwin fish meet the Question evolution! campaign"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::::::Why don't you ask [[Shockofgod]] if he likes it. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
 
::::::Why don't you ask [[Shockofgod]] if he likes it. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::::is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::::::is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::::::Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvW5PuAVbmY slam goal after goal] in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious!  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 20:44, November 30, 2011

This animation is really really bad. Can't you find a better one? MaxFletcher 15:13, 30 November 2011 (EST)

Don't worry, it appears given the expanding volunteer base of a certain group, soon there will be animations/essays using piranha or schools of sharks. :) Conservative 15:23, 30 November 2011 (EST)
OK, but in the meantime this animation is terrible. It looks bad and moves even worse. Not a good image. MaxFletcher 15:29, 30 November 2011 (EST)
Why don't you ask Shockofgod if he likes it. :) Conservative 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? MaxFletcher 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to slam goal after goal in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious! Conservative 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)