Difference between revisions of "Template talk:City"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I think it would be more clear if "Density" were changed to "Population Density," and the units (looks like people per square mile) were included in the articles. --~~~~")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think it would be more clear if "Density" were changed to "Population Density," and the units (looks like people per square mile) were included in the articles. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 13:21, 28 December 2011 (EST)
 
I think it would be more clear if "Density" were changed to "Population Density," and the units (looks like people per square mile) were included in the articles. --[[User:Toadaron|AaronT]] 13:21, 28 December 2011 (EST)
 +
:I changed Density to Population Density which is more clear. For the moment, the units are to be added in the articles but we could put it directly in the template but ''people per square mile'' looks a bit long. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 15:39, 28 December 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 20:39, December 28, 2011

I think it would be more clear if "Density" were changed to "Population Density," and the units (looks like people per square mile) were included in the articles. --AaronT 13:21, 28 December 2011 (EST)

I changed Density to Population Density which is more clear. For the moment, the units are to be added in the articles but we could put it directly in the template but people per square mile looks a bit long. --PhilipN 15:39, 28 December 2011 (EST)