Difference between revisions of "Mystery:What Causes Aging?"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by BobtheBuilder2 (talk) to last revision by Bugler)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Aging remains a mystery to science. What causes it?  What ''is'' it?  How does one define it?
+
Throughout history, many theories of aging have existed. Currently, modern empirical theories of aging are categorized into two groups: stochastic damage-based theories of aging and programmed theories of aging
  
−
Logically, aging is simply a progression to [[Heaven]] or [[Hell]].  It is nothing more or less. The past merely represents points further away from one's destination, while the future is simply points closer to one's destination.
+
These groups however, are not strict categories as programmed theories of aging may also incorporate elements of damage based theories.
 +
Especially relevant theories known to the public include the free radical theory of aging as well as aging determined by genetics. However, recently empirical evidence of a hormesis effect by free radicals as well as conflicting data weaken the free radical theory.
  
−
This model for aging easily explains enigmas that are otherwise puzzling, including:
+
Additional questions include:
  
−
*why conversion becomes more difficult as one grows older
+
What genetic pathways might influence aging?
−
*why criminals often commit worse and worse crimes
+
How does the evolutionary theory of aging affect programmed theories of aging?
−
*why so many Christian martyrs have willing accepted earthly death
 
−
*why aging does not necessarily make one more wise or just
 
−
 
 
−
(add more)
 
−
 
 
−
[[Category:Mystery]]
 

Revision as of 03:33, December 30, 2011

Throughout history, many theories of aging have existed. Currently, modern empirical theories of aging are categorized into two groups: stochastic damage-based theories of aging and programmed theories of aging

These groups however, are not strict categories as programmed theories of aging may also incorporate elements of damage based theories. Especially relevant theories known to the public include the free radical theory of aging as well as aging determined by genetics. However, recently empirical evidence of a hormesis effect by free radicals as well as conflicting data weaken the free radical theory.

Additional questions include:

What genetic pathways might influence aging? How does the evolutionary theory of aging affect programmed theories of aging?