Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Logo"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 40: Line 40:
 
[[Image:Another_logo.jpg|300px]]
 
[[Image:Another_logo.jpg|300px]]
 
As I said before, I really like this one.  Thank you for the great idea Ben!  Let me know what you think of it.--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 16:24, 7 January 2007 (EST)
 
As I said before, I really like this one.  Thank you for the great idea Ben!  Let me know what you think of it.--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 16:24, 7 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
I think the background earth is too vivid, it should be maybe light blue and green.--[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 16:49, 7 January 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 21:49, January 7, 2007

  • Also, I meant to ask you about the logo yesterday and completely forgot. I have fooled around making a couple logos but am not very happy with the results. I am assuming the colors should be blue, white and other neutral colors or maybe red (to match the featured aritcle and news headers). Let me know if you have a particular color scheme in mind. I'm also trying to decide what the logo should be based up, a cross or the letter C for example. So if you have any imput or ideas on this topic let me know. Sorry about this being so long!--SharonS 14:01, 5 January 2007 (EST)
    • Reply: I don't have any particular color scheme in mind. However, the colors of the logo need to blend well with the rest of the site. Post anything you have on here and we can improve them. Also, I came up with the logo below but Mr. Schlafly and I both agree that it is a little too republican. Even so, the colors and the "dullness" of this image are sortof what we are looking for.
Logo Concept.png
If anyone else has a good idea for a logo feel free to post it here. PhilipB 14:24, 5 January 2007 (EST)
  • Here is my favorite one:
LOGO3.jpg
There is something weird about it, but I can't quite tell what it is. Also, it doesn't say Conservapedia on it, but I can change that if you want me to. Please critique it, and I will improve it with your suggestions.
Thank you!
--SharonS 16:01, 5 January 2007 (EST)
PS: It doesn't really have that white background. It is supposed to be just the circle. Sharon


  • Here is my logo suggestion. I borrowed the C from sharon.
Conservalogo.JPG
Ben
    • Good work Ben! I have two comments about your logo: This may just be me, but the ovals sort of look like orbits of electrons around the nucleus in the bohr model of the atom, implying that Conservapedia is a scientific encyclopedia, while we really have content on all topics. The image looks a little "digital", meaning you can see the pixels creating that jagged look around the edges of the letters and lines. You might be able to fix this by adjusting your program to make higher quality images with more pixels.--SharonS 17:56, 5 January 2007 (EST)
    • Ben, it looks like Saturn. -Sarah
    • Thank you sharon, I agree on the first point; my original intention was to place the "Conservapedia" on top of one of those oval maps of the world. i could't do this because the only artistic medium i have on my comuter is paintbrush. That is also the reason why it looks "digital". Ben
    • Wow Sharon, that was deep :)
    • Ben, I like your idea about putting "Conservapedia" on top of a world map. I started to mess around with it a little and like the results so far. I will post it on here once it is presentable.--SharonS 22:39, 6 January 2007 (EST)


Conservapedia logo idea -2.JPG This is my logo suggestion --JessicaS 11:41, 7 January 2007 (EST)


  • Jessica, your logo is nice. I would suggest that you give the letters a little more room at the edges. Also, you might try cropping it to a square with rounded corners. Here is what I came up with based on Ben's excellent idea:

Another logo.jpg As I said before, I really like this one. Thank you for the great idea Ben! Let me know what you think of it.--SharonS 16:24, 7 January 2007 (EST)

I think the background earth is too vivid, it should be maybe light blue and green.--TimSvendsen 16:49, 7 January 2007 (EST)