User talk:Jpatt

Archive 2008

Here

Archive 2009

[1]

Archive 2010

[2]

Archive 2011

[3]

Blank3r

Good job stopping him.JonM 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)

Adambro

Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by "AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X". Is he a sockpuppet ? --PhilipN 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)

AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--Jpatt 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)

I will, thanks for the info. --PhilipN 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)

Thank you

Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? Lansing 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)

Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --Jpatt 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)

What a shame, indeed. Lansing 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)

I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. DynaboyJ 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)

You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--Jpatt 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)

Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. DynaboyJ 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)

Rubio

I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. Ayzmo :) 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)

Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.RachelW 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)

Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --Jpatt 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)

Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. RachelW 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)

It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. Ayzmo :) 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)

Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. RachelW 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)

It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --Jpatt 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)

Conservapedos – Did you know?

(Not so fast Scotty!)

The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists.

Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.)

Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them.

Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him!

Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site!

Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’!

Conservapedos – Did you know?

(Not so fast Scotty!)

The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists.

Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.)

Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them.

Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him!

Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site!

Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’!

Conservapedos – Did you know?

(Not so fast Scotty!)

The vast majority of your 325 million views are from people who come to laugh at the poor ignorant christian fundamentalists.

Most edits are reverts and endless arguments on talk pages. (We enjoy those by the way.)

Apart from the evolution, homosexuality, atheist, liberal, conservative and bestiality articles, there is nothing else entertaining or vaguely interesting on this site. Seriously, you might as well delete them.

Hang on a minute! Aren’t all the above articles written by Ken? He’s your biggest asset! You should stop being so mean to him. We open-minded, free-thinking, clever, atheist liberals love him!

Actually we would so far to say that Ken, or the mysterious group known as ‘user:conservative’ (as he likes to be known) is one of the greatest weapons against the religious right. He has single-handedly destroyed any credibility this site has. If you dare, just have a look at what people really think of this site!

Conservapedos – keep up the good work and don’t ever, EVER get rid of ‘user:conservative’!