Difference between revisions of "Historical science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(missing reflist) |
(adding see also section) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Empirical science]] | ||
| + | *[[Experimental science]] | ||
| + | *[[Operation science]] | ||
| + | *[[Origin science]] | ||
| + | *[[Paleoscience]] | ||
Revision as of 21:06, January 25, 2012
Historical science aims to describe phenomena of the past and reconstruct their causes.[1]
When trying to explain past phenomena, historical scientists try to construct a set of hypotheses about the causes and then look for a so called "smoking gun", a piece of evidence which indicates that one of the hypotheses might be a better explanation than the others.[2]
References
- ↑ Laudan, R. (1992). "What's so Special about the Past?", in Nitecki, M.H., and Nitecki, D.V.: History and Evolution. SUNY Press. ISBN 0791412113. Retrieved on 7 February 2010.
- ↑ Cleland, C.E. (September 2002). "Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science" (PDF). Philosophy of Science 69: 474–496. http://spot.colorado.edu/~cleland/articles/Cleland.PS.Pdf. Retrieved 25.1.2012.