User talk:AK

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Useful links


Hello, AK, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, AK!

--Jpatt 16:44, 26 November 2011 (EST)


Hello AK, this message is to remind you to add categories to the recent articles you created. Best wishes, AnupamTalk 18:16, 13 February 2012 (EST)

Reference Quotes

Hello AK, I noticed that you added the section titled "Czechoslovakia" to the militant atheism article. References 75, 76, and 79 do not have the original quotes from the text on which you based your added content. Could you please add the original quotes to the references as soon as possible? Thanks in advance. I look forward to seeing you do this. With regards, AnupamTalk 19:55, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Dear User:AK, even for web sources, the original text should be reproduced in the quote parameter of the reference template without any translation into English. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 19:59, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Red Links

Dear AK, thanks for adding in the original quotes to the references section! As of now, the "Czechoslovakia" section of the militant atheism contains numerous red links to articles that are non-existent. Do you plan to create those articles soon? If you do not plan to create those articles soon, could you please remove the red links? Thanks in advance. With regards, AnupamTalk 20:12, 18 February 2012 (EST)

Militant atheism

Hello! I saw your comment here and apologise for any error I made in editing the Czechoslovakia paragraph. Feel free to alter the paragraph in order that it presents the content accurately. With regards, AnupamTalk 00:36, 18 March 2012 (EDT)

Are you interested in creating this material?

Are you interested in creating this article: Atheism vs. Christianity? Also, it would be very helpful if these articles were created in order to assist in making this website to be the "go to" resource for atheism: Atheism Project. Also, if you want to ask your friends to contribute that would be good too. Conservative 20:18, 19 April 2012 (EDT)

I'm not sure how the question is meant, I'm definitely interested to contribute, but perhaps not as a main editor/creator of that article as I do not feel to have that deep grasp or clear vision of the topic to be able to create it on decent level.--AK 16:23, 22 April 2012 (EDT)
O.K. Conservative 06:38, 25 May 2012 (EDT)

request and promise

I have heard good things about your work from another editor. Could you please create articles for this project:

If you do create the articles for this project, I will feature them on the main page of Conservapedia in order to spotlight them.

Keep up the good work! People are noticing! Conservative 06:37, 25 May 2012 (EDT)

odd article.

I noticed that you edited the Celestial Sphere article and seem to know about that kind of stuff, could you tell me, does that article make any sense at all? It just seems really weird, I'm wondering if it might not be better off deleted. If there is something there though that I'm not getting just ignore this, but if you would have a look that'd be good. Cmurphynz 08:06, 14 October 2012 (EDT)

quick note

As per your request, I featured the ABC Theory of Emotion article on the main page. Conservative 20:42, 9 December 2013 (EST)

re: character disturbance

Dr. George K. Simon writes some interesting material. You might be interested in the "moral quotient" and the "character quotient" mentioned at: and and Conservative 02:47, 22 December 2013 (EST)


Hi AK. You quoted Darwin in your new "Shifting the burden of proof" article. But Darwin wasn't around in 1937. I couldn't see your source, so I don't know what the correct date is. Thanks for adding the article though. VargasMilan 01:42, 12 March 2015 (EDT)

That was typo, I will fix it, thanks.--AK 17:48, 12 March 2015 (EDT)

quick tip

Because reading a book is easier than reading an online article (no screen glare, etc. etc.), web designers try to make things as easy as possible on web readers though a variety of ways.

One of the chief ways is having smaller paragraphs because on the web big paragraphs look like walls of text.

To give you an idea of what I am saying, please look at my edits to this article of yours: Anthropological Revolution. Now the article is much more visually inviting to web visitors. Conservative 05:11, 14 March 2015 (EDT)

I would be remiss if I did not add that I like the interesting content that you produce, Thanks for contributing to this wiki. Conservative 16:02, 14 March 2015 (EDT)


As per your request, I made the change to flagellum plus the article is unlocked. Please feel free to further edit the article. Conservative 12:12, 11 July 2015 (EDT)

Thanks a lot! --AK 13:02, 12 July 2015 (EDT)

re: your email to me

AK, you are going to have resolve your questions via Andy the owner of Conservapedia and you can reach Andy via his talk page at:

I am sorry that I cannot be of more help at this time.


User: Conservative.

Thanks and made small title change to your article

Thanks for creating the Ideomotor effect article. It was a reminder to me of the Bible verse "There is a path before each person that seems right, but it ends in death."

I made a very small change the article title. I just removed the word "The" in the former title.

Again, thanks for creating more new content. Conservative (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2016 (EDT)

I realized it myself that "The" in the name of page was surplus but I did not know how to change it, that's why I just made a new redirect w/ the shorter version of the page name. Your fix is definitely better than that. Thanks a lot --AK (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2016 (EDT)
Your welcome. Glad I could be of assistance. Conservative (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2016 (EDT)

I unlocked the Sam Harris article.

I unlocked the Sam Harris article. In retrospect, I should not have locked it or should have unlocked it far sooner. Conservative (talk) 23:41, 7 January 2017 (EST)


You helped make THIS happen.

I have never seen a non-profit website go from below 100,000 rank to nearly a 50,000 Alexa ranking in about a year. And Andy payed zero dollars for internet marketing services during this period.

And there is no sign of a nearing web traffic plateau. My guess is that Trump supporters/Trump era and the resulting political waves significantly explains the boost in traffic.

Trump supporters seem very loyal so the traffic boost could be long lasting. It also seems like there is a reawakening of right-wing politics/nationalism that will be long lasting. And right-wing populism and "best of the public" go together like peanut butter and jelly. :) Conservative (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2017 (EST)


After some discussion (on my talk page and Andy's) it has been decided that I start an Internet Relay Chat channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009. It is now registered and somewhat set up. I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel. Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering. In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later. If you are interested, please let me know!
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --David B (TALK) 15:42, 11 April 2017 (EDT)

Can you let me know if you have a question? CityOfSilver 13:52, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
I'm not sure whether you mean that I should go online @ IRC, but that's what I just did.--AK (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2017 (EDT)

Article edit requests

Hello AK, thanks for all your work on sexual-themed articles. I noticed that another editor (working in good faith, I believe) added a lot of material to some articles that you edit. While these edits were in good faith, they were poorly formatted at least and make the articles harder to read. Would you please look at the Gender ideology article (in the "Overview" section, after I made some edits) and the Homophobia article (particularly, it's now-ridiculously long intro). Thanks. --1990'sguy (talk) 10:43, 18 January 2018 (EST)

Mistaken block

The block you received was accidental -- it was by a bot programmed to temporarily block suspicious users, but it's still a work in progress. Our apologies for that. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2018 (EST)

Sorry about that block. I'm working on the issue... --David B (TALK) 17:48, 9 November 2018 (EST)