Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rick Santorum"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DamianJohn (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST) | When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :Nah, Newt is our man [http://www.conservapedia.com/Gingrich_Administration]. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:23, 17 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:23, February 17, 2012
Obsessed? HelpJazz 19:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- What would you say? HenryS 19:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- I was going to look at the reference to see if I could pick out a better word, but there wasn't one. So without doing any research of my own, I would say something like "there was an increase of media coverage after..." or some such verifiable claim. HelpJazz 20:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- Oh man I just read more of the article and saw "cult-like" and "forthright and truthful". And no sources :( I should have quit while I was ahead. HelpJazz 20:32, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Senselessly
Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. Rob Smith 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)
Endorsement
When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --CraigF 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST)
- Nah, Newt is our man [1]. --DamianJohn 02:23, 17 February 2012 (EST)