Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RickFossett (talk) to last revision by Conservative)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
 
<!-- =============DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS TEXT WHEN ARCHIVING=================== -->
 
<!-- =============DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING ABOVE THIS TEXT WHEN ARCHIVING=================== -->
−
 
−
==Is atheism protected by the First Amendment?==
 
−
I think this issue needs to be researched and clarified in the page. Thank you. [[User:JoeSmithson117|JoeSmithson117]] 18:53, 4 December 2011 (EST)
 
−
::I am not a lawyer who specializes in U.S. Constitutional law. Setting the issue of the law aside, I can tell you that there will be no protecting atheism from the [[Question evolution! campaign]] which will rip it to shreds.
 
−
[[File:Carcharodon carcharias.jpg|thumbnail|400px|right|The [http://creation.com/question-evolution 15 razor sharp teeth] of the [[Question evolution! campaign]], are going to publicly rip [[evolution]]ary [[pseudoscience]] and atheism to shreds. Evolutionists have a long track record of getting devoured in [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBRpZhk_vA open water]  conditions (please see: [[Creation scientists tend to win the creation vs. evolution debates]].) ]]
 
−
::: Ooh, what a scary shark. Too bad in a real debate, big pictures with unfunny captions don't convince anybody. Of course, if all you care about is getting attention from your intellectual superiors, keep on doing what you're doing, you might not get Dawkins to mention you in his next book, but maybe some Atheist on YouTube looking for an easy target might take 5 minutes to inform his viewers what a unique personality you are. News Flash: Creation scientists do not "win" debates, they lose miserably and declare victory anyway, if they don't block the release of the debate video, of course. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 11:59, 20 February 2012 (EST)
 
−
::::Has [[Richard Dawkins]] debated [[William Lane Craig]] yet? (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]). Richard Dawkins was called a clown in the press in 2010 and the [[Question evolution! campaign]] will further demonstrate the man is a clown. Plus, he initially denied debating Rabbi Boteach in a videotaped debate the audience felt he lost (see: [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach]]).  In addition, Dawkins claimed Rabbi Boteach shrieked like Adolf Hitler during the debate. How could you possibly forget debating a rabbi who supposedly shrieked like Adolf Hitler which leads me to the conclusion that Richard Dawkins is a fraud and a liar (see: [[Atheism and deception]]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:10, 20 February 2012 (EST)
 
  
 
== Atheism shrinking is accelerating; the religious shall inherit the earth ==
 
== Atheism shrinking is accelerating; the religious shall inherit the earth ==
  
 
Atheist researcher of demographics of atheism says that the shrinking of atheism is expected to accelerate: [http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/05/eric-kaufmann-shall-religious-inherit.html Religious shall inherit the earth] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:54, 20 February 2012 (EST)
 
Atheist researcher of demographics of atheism says that the shrinking of atheism is expected to accelerate: [http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/05/eric-kaufmann-shall-religious-inherit.html Religious shall inherit the earth] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:54, 20 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 15:58, February 24, 2012

Set 2 of Archives
Set 1 of Archives

Atheism shrinking is accelerating; the religious shall inherit the earth

Atheist researcher of demographics of atheism says that the shrinking of atheism is expected to accelerate: Religious shall inherit the earth Conservative 22:54, 20 February 2012 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Atheism&oldid=963648"