Difference between revisions of "Talk:Southern strategy"
From Conservapedia
(Created page with "If I'm not mistaken, Democrats would usually take all Southern states until the sixties, where they took a stance against segregation. That's when Republicans started winning th...") |
(See Engel v. Vitale, which banned classroom prayer, and other liberal rulings by the Warren Court. Liberal newspapers just cannot accept that the South votes based on religious va) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If I'm not mistaken, Democrats would usually take all Southern states until the sixties, where they took a stance against segregation. That's when Republicans started winning them.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 20:56, 6 March 2012 (EST) | If I'm not mistaken, Democrats would usually take all Southern states until the sixties, where they took a stance against segregation. That's when Republicans started winning them.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 20:56, 6 March 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :See [[Engel v. Vitale]], which banned [[classroom prayer]], and other liberal rulings by the [[Warren Court]]. [[Liberal]] newspapers just cannot accept that the [[South]] votes based on religious values.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:04, 6 March 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:04, March 7, 2012
If I'm not mistaken, Democrats would usually take all Southern states until the sixties, where they took a stance against segregation. That's when Republicans started winning them.--CamilleT 20:56, 6 March 2012 (EST)
- See Engel v. Vitale, which banned classroom prayer, and other liberal rulings by the Warren Court. Liberal newspapers just cannot accept that the South votes based on religious values.--Andy Schlafly 21:04, 6 March 2012 (EST)
